Showing posts with label Women. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Women. Show all posts

Sunday, 6 November 2016

Humanist Heroines

The Stockport October meeting was an AGM followed by Robin
Grinter speaking on ‘Three Humanist Heroines: Mary Wollstonecraft, Annie Besant and Marie Stopes’. Whilst we hear a lot about Humanist men, but not
 enough about Humanist women. These three were selected because they were outspoken and combatant campaigners for radical changes to promote human rights, especially for women.

Mary Wollstonecraft had a short life, dying in 1797 after childbirth at the age of 38. She had a hard upbringing, leaving home at 19, founding a Dissenting school to promote justice and equality which collapsed, then becoming a governess in Ireland ill-treated by a dominating aristocratic employer.  
Her achievements included a brief history of the French Revolution and an open letter to Edmund Burke, entitled ‘A Vindication of the Rights of Men’.  She condemned both aristocratic and monarchical government, supported the French Revolutionaries and advocated a republic. She argued for an equal society based on reason, justice and the idea of progress, not tradition and custom, a year before Thomas Paine wrote ‘The Rights of Man’ . 
In 1792, Mary published her second revolutionary public letter ‘A Vindication of the Rights of Women’, which went far beyond Paine in demanding full human rights for all, not just for men. Her book attacked the assumption prevalent at the time that women were inferior to men: she said they only appeared inferior because they were denied education.  Her revolutionary thinking was set in a reasonably conventional social context. While she argued strongly for the right for women to have careers, she saw their role primarily as loyal wives and good mothers and accepted the social and class structure of her day.

Annie Besant, born in 1847, was brought up in the Church of England, and married a clergyman. However she lost her faith and became increasingly atheist. When she refused to take Holy Communion her husband divorced her. She joined the National Secular Society (set up by Charles Bradlaugh in 1866) and edited its journal ‘the National Reformer’. She lived with Bradlaugh and they worked closely together. Annie became a powerful orator, speaking on freedom of thought, secularism, workers’ rights, birth control and women’s rights. 
 In 1877 she and Bradlaugh published an American book advocating birth control by contraception. This enraged the Church and Annie and Bradlaugh were taken to court. Though the case was dropped she lost custody of her daughter.  In her Autobiography she said ‘I exposed the history of the Catholic Church with unsparing hatred, its persecutions, its religious wars, its cruelties and its oppressions….no philosophy, no religion has brought so glad a message to the world as this good news of Atheism.’
With radical views she joined the Fabian Movement and later on the Marxist Social Democratic Federation, leading to a break with the more right wing Bradlaugh. Annie became a union organiser, speaking at the Bloody Sunday protest meeting of the unemployed in 1887 and organising the union of the London Dockers. But her main achievement was her work in 1888 for the welfare of women working in the Bryant and May match factory in London leading to Union recognition, raised wages and improved conditions.
Annie also fought successfully for improvements in the education of poor children in London pledging to work for ‘No more hungry children’. She devoted her formidable energies to organising free meals and free medical examinations to bring this about. 
Annie also spoke on behalf of women’s right to vote at meetings of the Suffragette Movement.

Marie Stopes, a paleobiologist lecturing at University College, London and Manchester University, was a brave campaigner for women’s rights and a pioneer in Britain of birth control. She set up a network of clinics, and various societies to organise and campaign for birth control. These societies became the Family Planning Association in 1931. The Marie Stopes International Global Partnership is now active in 38 countries.
Her two books, ‘Married Love ’and ‘Wise Parenthood’, both published in 1918,  gave women sexually explicit advice about methods of birth control. She also edited a magazine ‘Birth Control News’. When the Protestant and Catholic Churches called for her prosecution she held protest meetings outside Churches!
Marie believed birth control should only be practised within marriage, but she campaigned for the rights of married women teachers and for separate taxation of husbands and wives. However, she also believed in ‘Eugenics’ and argued for the ‘sterilisation of those totally unfit for parenthood – the insane, the feeble-minded and half-castes. 

Robin concluded by considering the credentials as Humanists of Annie Besant and Marie Stopes. Annie Besant lost her faith while married to a clergyman, gained a divorce and campaigned as an atheist. Towards the end of her life she developed an interest in theosophy, not a theistic stance, but certainly a spiritualist one with supernatural overtones.  Marie Stopes never dabbled in the divine, but she did become a proponent of eugenics at odds with the fundamental Humanist belief in the equal potential value of every human being.
Other influential women include Harriet Taylor, the wife and co-worker of John Stuart Mill; the novelist, Mary Ann Evans (George Eliot); Simone de Beauvoir; and Germaine Greer.
Isaac Newton remarked and Stephen Hawking has observed ‘we stand on the shoulders of giants’ who have made these changes possible. Let us add ‘and giantesses’, or ‘Humanist Heroines’.

Sunday, 11 October 2015

Feminism


At the Stockport September meeting we had Alex Sporidou, Trustee and Chair of Independent Choices Greater Manchester, giving a history of feminism from earliest times to present day.
As early as 2400 BCE, we have the first documentation of women’s bodies being controlled by men and the introduction of the veil in Mesopotamia. Early democracies such as Greece gave voting rights to men only. For many women in the world little has changed, for example under the Afghan Taliban, not entirely defeated, women do not exist.
The talk gave rise to an animated discussion often focussing on different people’s ideas of what feminism is and what it should be.

Saturday, 1 August 2015

Amnesty International



The July GMH meeting was a talk and interactive workshop on Amnesty by Anne Walker.  Anne is a voluntary member of Amnesty and as such confesses to not being a specialist in human rights law. Her main involvement is in the Amnesty Trainers Network where she helps develop material for local campaigns for Amnesty International UK (AIUK).


Amnesty is based in London and has 5 hubs globally. Its vision: ‘is of a world in which every person enjoys all of the human rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and other international human rights instruments’.


Although it started out as an organisation supporting prisoners of conscience, its mission now is: ‘To undertake research and action focused on preventing and ending grave abuses of these rights’.


The Manchester branch of AIUK to which Anne belongs has four campaigns underway currently:

1. Stop Torture Campaign which is focused on 5 countries: Nigeria, Mexico, Morocco, Uzbekistan and the Philippines.
2. Save the Human Rights Act
3. Country Specific Campaigns in:
  • Burma
  • Southern Africa
  • Countries in South America (esp. Venezuela) 
4. My Body My Rights - The My Body My Rights campaign comes from the belief that ‘sexual and reproductive rights are human rights that belong to us all’. Furthermore they entitle us to:
  • Make decisions about our own health, body, sexual life and identity without fear of coercion or criminalisation 
  • Seek and receive information about sexuality and reproduction, and access related health services and contraception
  • Choose our intimate partner and whether and when to marry
  • Decide what type of family to create
  • Live free from discrimination, coercion, violence, including rape and other sexual violence, female genital mutilation, forced pregnancy, forced abortion, forced sterilisation and forced marriage.
It is noteworthy that the UDHR does not cover sexual and reproductive rights (SRR) and does not apply to the unborn child. However some international human rights law does now cover SRR and has made recommendations to states to adopt it.

In Latin America in places where there is no access to contraception and no sex education there is the highest rate of teen pregnancy. And where there is additionally a total abortion ban 57% of teen deaths in pregnancy are due to suicide.

Some of the reasons given for not allowing or providing contraception are:
  • Suspicion – belief that it has another purpose
  • Trust – some men believe it leads their women to infidelity
  • Tradition – large families are seen as a good thing
  • Affordability – it has to be paid for and women are afraid to ask their husbands for the money 
Campaigns in support of SRR are underway in:
  • Burkina Faso – to promote access to affordable contraception
  • Nepal – to prevent uterine prolapsed due to women being put to work very soon after pregnancy
  • Maghreb – where rape victims are forced to marry their rapists. This has its foundations in old French law that was only repealed in France in 1994. Morocco has changed its law but Algeria and Tunisia still have it.
  • El Salvador – to end a total ban on abortion.  Anne gave an example of a pregnant woman for whom after 3 scans it was shown that the foetus had brain damage but an abortion was denied. An international campaign forced the government to allow an intervention, but they delayed till much later so that it could be classed as induced labour.  In another case a doctor was given a prison sentence for carrying out an abortion which was in fact a miscarriage.
Anne also mentioned the law in Ireland where in both the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland abortion is illegal except in limited circumstances. The maximum sentence for carrying out an abortion in N. Ireland is life and in the Republic it’s 14 years.

This was an interactive presentation whereby audience members were allocated into groups and asked to present back their own views regarding the issues of women’s rights and what could be done about them. It generated a lot of lively discussion within and amongst the groups all of whom seemed appreciative of the opportiunity to participate.

If you’re supportive of Amnesty’s campaigns, there are a couple of online petitions that you might be interested in:

Save the Human Rights Act http://www.amnesty.org.uk/issues/Human-Rights- Act

Abortion Law Reform - Republic of Ireland  http://www.amnesty.org.uk/issues/Sexual-and- reproductive-rights http://www.amnesty.org.uk/issues/Sexual-and- reproductive-rights

Tuesday, 7 July 2015

Rise of the Religious Right and the Impact on Women

June's GMH Meeting was a talk about the rise of the religious right and the impact on women in the UK, given by Sandhya Sharma.

The talk started with a video dating back 20 or so years showing how women in minority, primarily Asian, communities in London started to demonstrate against the then rise of religious fundamentalism and how they were ignored by the anti-racist and leftist movements. Also how women in Bradford around the same time started to demonstrate against domestic violence in their communities and how the religious leaders and the political left tried to shut them up.  Moving on to more recent times Sandhya explained how there’d been a gradual shift from state sponsored secular services, e.g. welfare and housing services, towards services run by religious institutions. Austerity measures from the government had heightened the effect with almost no public money going into entirely secular services like the Asian Refuge (for women and children fleeing domestic violence or forced marriages) with which Sandhya was involved.  However the people providing the services run by religious institutions are often from the very communities the women are seeking refuge from. And rather than holding the perpetrators responsible for their immoral, and sometimes illegal, actions, e.g. in matters related to domestic violence and abuse, their preference is often to take a conciliatory approach and unite the parties again.